|
2002: The Year Of The Abandoned Investor
For the second year in a
row, there will be a sigh of relief when a year is finally behind us. In
2001, the reason was obvious; this year, embattled investors are looking
for signs that the bear market is finally over. With just two weeks left
in the year, however, the Nasdaq Composite and the S&P 500 are down
30% and 22%, respectively, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down
just 15%.
While this is better than
the mid-summer bottom, it has been a long time since investors have had
something really to cheer about, especially something that has lasted more
than just a few weeks. As one head of convertible sales at a large
securities firm likes to remind us, the last time the market declined
three years in a row (which will officially be the case in two weeks’
time), World War II followed. A sobering thought, but one that,
notwithstanding the threat of war with Iraq, is not likely to come to pass
this time around.
Other than the managed
care sector, which has outperformed the market this year, and the hospital
sector before Tenet Healthcare’s (NYSE: THC) disclosures several
weeks ago, the performance of most health care stocks has mirrored the
overall market. One other exception is the pharmaceutical sector, which
has suffered disproportionately ever since the meltdown began with the Bristol-Myers
Squibb (NYSE: BMY)/ImClone Systems (NAS-DAQ: IMCL) fiasco. All
of the major pharmaceutical companies should end the year with negative
returns except Forest Laboratories (NYSE: FRX), which is up about
20% for the year and recently announced a 2-for-1 stock split. Six
companies in the sector could end the year with a 30% or greater drop in
market cap.
Quite obviously, the
tenor of the overall market has impacted the ability of smaller companies
to tap the IPO market. So far in 2002, there have been fewer than 20
health care IPOs, with one more expected to be priced before year-end.
Although the performance of these IPOs has been mixed, with a range of
-56% to +50% from their offering prices, all but two did eventually trade
above their initial pricing levels. The problem is that over time, most of
these IPOs trended downward and seven are now in single digits. Investors
remain skeptical, and that is why nearly a dozen health care IPOs have
been withdrawn from the market since last summer.
One IPO that could have
given the market a boost, Merck’s (NYSE: MRK) spin-off of Medco
Health Solutions in a $1.0 billion offering, was pulled in July as its
pricing levels started to erode. The pricing level began to deteriorate
even before it was revealed that 20% of Medco’s revenues were actually
the $10 and $20 co-payments to pharmacies that the company never actually
received. Even though Medco’s bottom line is not impacted by this
accounting treatment, and at least one other company does the same thing,
the news spooked investors enough to cause the underwriters to withdraw
the offering. Now, the IPO is expected to be brought to market in
mid-2003, but whether the expected pricing has dropped even further is
unknown.
Despite the lack of an
IPO market, or perhaps because of it, venture firms continue to pump funds
into growing health care companies. For most of the year, at least 20 new
deals were announced each month, with total funds invested averaging
between $250 million and $400 million. In the past two months, the volume
has been the heaviest of the year, and while health care technology and
development companies dominate the investment activity, health services is
beginning to attract some renewed interest. The higher volume can be
attributed to lower values placed on the companies as well as to the
dearth of other funding alternatives for existing investors.
The problem, of course,
is that at some point the venture capital well will run dry for these
companies, and they will have to raise additional capital by going public,
or else they will be sold to larger competitors. Either way, public
company investors should benefit because unless there is a sharp rise in
the market, IPOs in 2003 will be reasonably priced and significantly
discounted from values that would have been obtainable a few years ago.
Alternatively, if the companies end up being sold off because of a lack of
demand in the IPO market, acquisition prices will be discounted, and that
should be accretive to the earnings of the ultimate buyer.
And speaking of the
merger and acquisition market, relative to other sectors, the health care
M&A market has been alive and well in 2002, with an increase in both
deal volume and total transaction value. The latter was helped, obviously,
by the $60 billion price tag for the acquisition of Pharmacia Corp.
(NYSE: PHA) by Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), since the largest deal in 2001
was just $16 billion. This year should end with just over 900 announced
health care transactions for $100 billion (for deals with disclosed
prices), compared with 820 and $75.3 billion last year.
Other than the Pharmacia
deal, transactions are getting smaller in general. Barring a surprise
announcement in the last two weeks of the year, there were only eight
M&A transactions in 2002 with price tags of $1.0 billion or more,
compared with 13 last year and 14 in 2000. Excluding the largest deal in
both 2002 and 2001, the average deal size dropped to $44 million this year
compared with $72 million in 2001.
If financing had been
more plentiful, the volume of health care mergers and acquisitions this
year would have been higher, primarily because valuations have become more
reasonable. There also would have been more competition for target
companies than occurred in 2002. In other words, with values driven so
low, one would have expected to see more bargain-hunters enter the market,
and more bidding wars, such as the battle for NCS Healthcare (OTCBB:
NCSS) that is about to come to an end.
When Genesis Health
Ventures (NASDAQ: GHVI), with the full backing of NCSS management (who
also controlled more than 65% of NCSS stock), agreed to buy the company
last July for approximately $1.60 per share, it looked like that might be
the end of the story. But when OmniCare (NYSE: OCR), which had
already been rebuffed by management, offered $3.00 per share, and then
$3.50 per share, which was ultimately matched by Genesis, we had the
makings of a true battle, the likes of which had not been seen in a few
years.
Just two weeks ago it
appeared as if Genesis would finally win in court, where the skirmish had
moved. But then OCR got a court injunction, and raised its cash offer by
an unheard of 57% to $5.50 per share, a price that Genesis was unwilling
to match. This bidding war took place because investors had undervalued
NCSS while the value of the business to the two competitors was,
ultimately, worth more than three times the original public market value
last summer. In fact, a year ago NCSS traded for less than $0.10 per
share, but has over $600 million of revenues. More of this should occur
next year if potential buyers try to understand the inherent value of some
of the targets in the market and if public equity values remained
depressed.
Values may remain
relatively low, at least for the first half of next year, because
investors are tired of the series of "surprises" with which they
were bombarded throughout 2002, causing many of them to abandon the health
care sector entirely. But if Bristol-Myers has one more embarrassing
disclosure, or HealthSouth (NYSE: HRC), Tenet Healthcare or some
other provider has another Medicare "interpretation issue," it
won’t take much for more investors to walk away from the sector and
others to remain on the sidelines even longer. Because health care
technology is becoming increasingly complicated, and the entire
reimbursement system is worse than the tax code, it is no wonder that
investors are confused. But where there is chaos and puzzlement,
opportunity will eventually appear for those that are patient.
|