|
Heading South: The Burglar of Birmingham
It all began with a new
"interpretation" of Medicare reimbursement regulations last
summer, something of which HealthSouth’s (NYSE: HRC) management
informed startled shareholders, which was going to lower annual EBITDA by
up to $175 million. That little bit of news sent the company’s shares
down by 50% and left suspicious shareholders wondering when the other shoe
would drop. Investors were split: Some believed that when the dust settled
you still had the predominant rehab and surgery center player in the
country that held some value for shareholders above $4.00 per share (we
were in that camp), while others held that this type of misstep had
occurred one too many times and regardless of whether any
"value" was left, they would abandon the stock for good.
As the world now knows,
the other shoe dropped, and it made quite a thud. With charges that the
company made up more than $1.4 billion in profits over the past decade,
class action lawyers are lining up. Reimbursement scandals are nothing
new, and unfortunately, accounting scandals are nothing new, and investors
have had their share of both in the past two years. Remember when a Business
Week writer stated that the Cendant accounting
"problem" of made-up profits of a predecessor company would be
the financial scandal of the decade? It was nothing in comparison with
what has transpired since. But in the case of HealthSouth, what is truly
unbelievable is 1) how long the alleged phony profits went on for, 2) how
many people were involved, 3) how quickly people started pleading guilty
to conspiracy to commit fraud (among other things) and 4) the apparent
fact that the fraud was passed on from one CFO to another . . . and
another.
With more than a
half-dozen executives already charged with various criminal counts, and in
most cases pleading guilty, it is ludicrous that Richard Scrushy, the
fired founder, still maintains he knew nothing and is "shocked"
by the allegations. Although still not charged with any criminal
wrongdoing (SEC charges have already been made), it is only a matter of
time until the lawyers build their case against the Burglar of Birmingham.
Switching back and forth
between news reports from Baghdad and Birmingham, it was amusing, and sad,
to watch events unfold in Birmingham. Mr. Scrushy’s outsized ego, with
classic examples of the cult of personality, was well known within his
company and state. His various "palaces" and other play-toys
have been put on display over the past few weeks. Mr. Scrushy’s name or
picture is displayed everywhere, usually connoting benevolence of some
sort (it’s easy to give money away when it really is not yours). And
now, with the images of statues being pulled down thousands of miles away,
a statue of Mr. Scrushy in Birmingham with "thief" spray painted
across it appeared in a New York-area newspaper (to our knowledge it is
still standing). Finally, some of the participants in the fraud have
apparently admitted to the U.S. Attorney handling the case that they
feared physical or psychological retribution if they came forward with
details of the fraudulent accounting practices.
Then, in early April, Mr.
Scrushy asked to have $10 million of emergency living expenses and
$600,000 per month for business expenses unfrozen from his pool of assets
(plus $33 million to pay taxes). Just like the Iraqi information minister,
it seems that reality has not yet set in.
Although Mr. Scrushy’s
attorney initially stated that his client had no knowledge of the alleged
fraud and was as shocked as anyone, the possibility that this is true is,
as we all know, rather remote. His grip on the company was so tight that
one analyst stopped covering the company because he was not allowed to
have one-on-one meetings with the various division heads or the CFO.
During visits to Birmingham, they apparently all gathered in one room
with, of course, Mr. Scrushy at the head of the table answering all of the
questions. If that is not an eyebrow-raiser, we do not know what is.
Financial fraud is a
difficult thing to uncover, as any auditor will admit, especially when
there has been no suspicion of fraud. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the
HealthSouth fraud is such that Ernst & Young, the now fired
auditors, should have been able to pick something up over the years. In
addition, if members of the board had not been so involved financially
with Mr. Scrushy, they may not have been caught asleep at the wheel as
well. Last August, with the earnings plunge revelation, was the opportune
time to fire Mr. Scrushy, especially because the timing of his stock sales
just did not smell right. Instead, the board wimped out and allowed him to
return as CEO of the parent company after the decision to split the
company in two was suspended. A rather pathetic show of corporate
governance, if there ever was one.
The various trials may
begin later this year, and more facts will certainly become known. But the
company’s declaration that no financial statements since the late 1980s
should be trusted is certainly a blow to creditors, who will eventually
end up controlling the company. And even though some of the surgery center
partners are trying to sever their ties to HealthSouth, and in one case
reported in the media no longer using the HealthSouth name, the fact
remains that the company is the dominant rehab and ambulatory surgery
provider in the country. And they didn’t get to that position as a
result of phony profits. Rather, there have been a lot of satisfied
customers, and financial fraud or not, the company continues to be
dominant in many of the markets it serves.
No one knows yet exactly
where the accounting fraud has occurred, so it is difficult to determine
how profitable the company really is. The ambulatory surgery business had
a reported EBITDA margin of 30% to 35%, which is slightly higher than
competitor United Surgical Partners (NASDAQ: USPI) but less than
the most recent margin reported by Amsurg (NASDAQ: AMSG), so it is
reasonable to suspect that what you see is what you get. Consequently, if
the current management can keep the surgery center partnerships intact,
then their actual cash flow, and the value of the business, should be
determinable.
The rehab business will
be more difficult, partly because that is where the reimbursement games
were played and where the federal government will also be taking a closer
look. Also, because it is made up of both inpatient hospitals and
outpatient therapy centers, looking for competitor margins and values will
not be as easy. Before the accounting scandal, it was believed that after
separating the surgery center business and subtracting the $175 million in
lost EBITDA as a result of the Medicare "change," the rest of
HealthSouth was supposed to have produced up to $800 million of EBITDA in
2002, most of which was from the rehab businesses. Now, it is anyone’s
guess, and that is exactly what it is until the new management is able to
sort through the financial data and determine what is real and what is
not. One thing is certain; no one expects that $800 million of EBITDA to
materialize. The "change" in reimbursement? Our guess is that
last summer management knew that its grip around the fraud was loosening,
so what better way to lower investor expectations regarding the true level
of profits than to blame it on Medicare?
If management is able to
hold the pieces in place, HealthSouth should remain a viable business. It
will be interesting to see what the creditors want to do, because they
were the ones that prevented the spin-off of the surgery center business
last year. Today, it may be in their interest, from a value perspective,
to see this happen. For Mr. Scrushy and his partners in crime, jail time
is unavoidable and certainly deserved. In our September 2002 Health-South
lead story, we made reference to the phrase "three strikes and you’re
out." Now, it looks like management tried to steal home one too many
times and finally got caught.
|