|
The Business, and Risk, of Fighting
Cancer
There are many people who believe that there
is something
unsavory about turning a profit in health care. But the reality is,
without an economic incentive, we would not have nearly the number of
medical discoveries and therapeutic improvements that a large percentage
of the population currently rely on for a normal, day-to-day lifestyle.
Cancer, at one time only whispered behind closed doors because of its
death-sentence-like reputation, continues to be the leading demon in
health care circles, even though survival rates have vastly improved. With
the recent news from several companies, they will continue to improve.
The herd mentality was in
full force during the past several weeks, as biotech companies began
releasing the results of their latest clinical studies on new ways of
treating cancer, and investors seemed to buy shares of any company that
was having success, or was poised to have success, with any experimental
cancer treatments. After suffering through a 40% plunge in value during
2002, the biotech sector has surged in recent weeks, making up all of last
year’s loss. Since March alone, the AMEX Biotech Index has surged by 50%.
Were biotech stocks undervalued at the end of last year by a market
focused on current profits, or are they overvalued today on what may be
irrational exuberance over the current cancer treatment hype? In the
current case, the rising tide has raised all ships regardless of their
flag, but some will sink just as fast.
The one
company that certainly deserved renewed investor respect, and interest,
was Genentech (NYSE: DNA), which informed the public 10 days before
the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology that its
new drug for treating colorectal cancer performed better than expected.
Wall Street had not been expecting much at all from the clinical trial,
and in a case of unbelievably bad timing, a day before the news came out,
a Banc of America Securities analyst cut his rating on DNA
to "sell" from "neutral" because of the general pessimism about what the
drug, Avastin, would be able to do. Timing is everything.
No one could blame
the analyst for his doubts, because Avastin had previously failed in
breast cancer patients, and there was no real reason to expect it to
perform well in the treatment of colon cancer. But perform it did,
extending the lives of colon cancer patients by more than 30% when used
with standard chemotherapy. Of 800 previously untreated patients with
spreading colon cancer, Avastin combined with chemotherapy increased the
chance for survival by 50%. In the world of cancer treatment, this is not
just good news, but a breakthrough.
The drug works by cutting off the
flow of blood, and the oxygen it carries, to the tumor, depriving the
tumor of the necessary nutrients to grow. This technique was first
successfully used on mice by another company, but it has taken five years
to take it to the next step on humans. Now, DNA is in discussions with the
FDA about its plans for filing an approval application for Avastin. This
will be a high profile application, with much pressure on the FDA for
quick approval.
Within a day of
the Banc of America rating cut, DNA soared by almost 40% in value to more
than $52 per share, and continued rising to above $70 per share, giving
the company a market cap of approximately $37 billion. The company had
just $2.7 billion in revenue last year, but Avastin is expected to
generate up to $2 billion in revenue alone, so its impact on DNA obviously
will be quite dramatic. The drug is currently being tested to treat lung
and kidney cancer, and Genentech already makes Rituxan (for non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma) and Herceptin (for breast cancer). Colon cancer is the second
leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., so Avastin’s success will be
studied and improved upon in coming years.
The other big story was
ImClone Systems’ (NASDAQ: IMCL) cancer-fighting drug Erbitux,
which, unlike Avastin, was expected to show positive results in its latest
clinical trial. As the cancer world now knows, the latest trial, completed
by IMCL’s German partner, Merck KGaA, included 329 colorectal
cancer patients who had failed to respond to chemotherapy alone, and
produced almost the identical results as the trial in 2001 that was
rejected by the FDA because of methodology issues. Just like the first
time, 11% of the patients taking Erbitux alone saw a 50% reduction in the
size of their tumors, while 23% saw a similar shrinkage when taking it in
combination with standard chemotherapy.
By the end of this year,
Erbitux could be approved for sale in Switzerland, which has agreed to a
fast-track review of four months, and elsewhere in Europe in 2004. ImClone
and its U.S. partner, Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY), may file
with the FDA by the end of this summer, and there will be a lot of
pressure on the agency. There have been questions raised as to why Merck
KgaA did not have a control group who received just chemotherapy in order
to bolster their case. But the response had more to do with ethics than
clinical standards: Since these patients had already failed to respond to
standard chemotherapy, why subject them to another meaningless round when
some of them would respond favorably to Erbitux? A logical answer, but
IMCL does not need any more clouds over its procedures.
After reaching a low of
$5.24 per share last September (when BMY may have thought about tendering
for the remaining 80% of IMCL it does not already own), ImClone jumped to
over $47 per share before settling back into the $34 to $36 per share
range. Although not as high as the $73 per share attained before the first
clinical trial was turned down in late 2001, and the ensuing insider
trading scandal, shareholders who had faith in the merits of Erbitux (and
not management) have finally been rewarded for their patience.
Not to throw a damp towel
on the oncologist love-fest, but many questions do remain. The studies do
not detail the quality of life for the extra three to six months that
colon cancer patients may have, nor do they begin to explain why, in the
case of Erbitux, 89% of patients who received just Erbitux, and 77% of
those who received the combination therapy, had little or no improvement.
When the scientists are able to figure out why it worked on the minority
of patients and why not on the others, then we will have a real
breakthrough, and that will be where the real money is made.
The other issue, which is
the same for any new therapy, is cost. Calls to ImClone seeking
information about the potential cost were not returned, as perhaps the
staff was more interested in watching the news for the sentencing of their
ex-boss, Sam Waksal. The unfortunate reality is that almost 80% of those
who will ultimately receive Erbitux combined with chemotherapy, assuming
it is approved by the FDA, will not benefit. And how will it be determined
which new therapy is used on colon cancer patients, if we do not know why
they work on some and not on others? Despite these nagging questions,
significant progress has been made and answers will be forthcoming. But
the euphoria, at least from an investment perspective, may be a bit
overdone.
Several biotech stocks
saw their share prices soar by 50% to 500% after the ImClone and Genentech
clinical trial results were made public. Abgenix (NASDAQ: ABGX) is
developing a drug with similarities to Erbitux, and its price jumped by
more than 60% recently and is up 145% since February. The company has
minimal revenues but its market cap has now topped $1 billion. Entremed
(NASDAQ: ENMD), which completed the previously mentioned study on mice
five years ago, has a drug in the same family of drugs as Avastin, and its
shares soared by 100% in May and 390% since the beginning of the year.
Little Vion
Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: VION) has increased by nearly 500% since
early January, with its shares rising from $0.40 to $2.35. The company has
two experimental cancer drugs that have shown promising results against
tumors in early stage trials. The company has even terminated a Phase I
trial on another cancer drug candidate to divert funds for Phase II trials
of these two other drugs.
One biotech firm, Oxigene
(NASDAQ: OXGN), has increased from $0.78 per share late last December to a
new high of $19.40 on June 9. The company said that the FDA has granted
fast-track designation to its lead vascular targeting agent for treating
advanced anaplastic thyroid cancer, and that it will combine the agent
with two chemotherapy drugs in a new clinical trial for patients with
advanced ovarian cancer. The share price has already dropped 40% from its
recent, and unwarranted, high, but the company did manage to sell 1.5
million common shares in a private placement at $10 per share.
The problem with
these huge run-ups in price is that just one little piece of bad news will
send them plummeting. And just as the news coming from Genentech and
ImClone touched off a major biotech rally, the next piece of bearish news
does not have to be company specific to impact any of these recent
high-flyers. Although the developments of the past few weeks mean we are
yet another step closer to finding a "cure" for cancer, it does not make
the biotech sector a safe place for investment, especially at current
prices. |