November
2004 issue
The Public Market Needs A Jump-Start Only
Two IPOs Are Priced, But They Are Faring Well
This month the public market has traded
quantity for quality, with very few offerings or filings made but a couple
of worthy IPOs.
...
Venture Capital Market
The health care venture capital market certainly has not suffered in the
days leading up to and after the presidential election, with deal volume
and total dollars committed both on par with last month’s figures. See
page 1
...
Private Equity Market
Health care companies raised 34% more private equity this year than they
did last November, and investor confidence in some companies may be
bolstered by recent federally-funded initiatives. See page 11
...
Departments
Public Market Chart P3
M&A Deal Chart P5
Venture Capital Charts P7-9
Private Placement Charts P11-13
Notes & Briefs P16
Sign
up for a trial subscription and get the current issue!
Read the past
headlines. |
The Public Market Needs A Jump-Start Only
Two IPOs Are Priced, But They Are Faring Well
Back in March we said that
the public equity market in general had stalled, but not for health care.
After a brief pickup during the summer months, with the approach and
closing of the 2004 presidential election, the public equity market for
health care companies has not only stalled, but it is uncertain when it
will get moving again. We thought the end of the election, with no drawn
out legal battles like four years ago and all the uncertainty that comes
with it, would be enough to get investors in the game. This has not,
however, been the case.
There are just 10
public equity deals we are reporting on this month, but two of them
involve IPOs being withdrawn—one pulled out due to market conditions and
the other has decided not to make an offering at all. The other offerings
included two IPOs that were priced, one secondary that was priced and two
others that are on deck, and a few other IPOs that were either filed or
with estimated terms released.
Perhaps one of the
reasons why investors are avoiding public health care equities in general
is the rash of negative news in the general media. Public confidence in
pharmaceutical companies is diminishing along with the dwindling supplies
of flu vaccine, as concerns over drug safety are increasing. Issues
revolving around the safety of drugs and the accuracy of their advertising
are tarnishing what has been one of the top American businesses for quite
a while. Who would have thought that Merck (NYSE: MRK), one of the
most respected companies in the country, would find itself in its current
situation, with shareholders taking a nearly $50 billion bath in a matter
of weeks? The fallout on the rest of the health care sector has to be
huge, and investors are finding other places to park their money.
Meanwhile other companies that make COX-2 inhibitors, including Pfizer
(NYSE: PFE), find themselves in the position of having to defend the
safety of their products.
Although the
biotechnology sector continues to attract a hefty share of health care
investments, this sector is still in its youthful stages and we have yet
to learn just how much of the current biotech research being done will pan
out for patients and investors in the long run. In contrast, in last
year’s November issue, 15 health care companies had priced either an IPO
or a secondary, plus another nine were waiting in the wings. Back then we
were still waiting for the door to really open for health care IPOs, and
it had opened a crack last year, and again this year, briefly—but at this
point that door is just swinging in the breeze of uncertainty.
Of those
companies that did make the float during the past four weeks, VNUS
Medical Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: VNUS) has, in the short term
anyway, done better than most of the other health care companies that have
completed an IPO this year. After being priced at the top of its range, or
$15.00 per share, by Banc of America Securities and Piper
Jaffray, VNUS stock has been on the rise, closing at nearly $19 per
share as of this publication.
After
withdrawing its original registration in 2001, VNUS Medical re-filed for
its IPO in July of this year, at a time when the public market may have
reached its kindest point of this year for health care. It seems that for
VNUS, it was well worth the wait. The original filing, done in 2000,
called for an offering of 4,250,000 shares, with a projected price range
of $11.00 to $13.00 per share, and was to be led by U.S. Bancorp Piper
Jaffray Inc., Chase Securities Inc. and Dain Rauscher
Incorporated. The San Jose, California-based company makes devices for
the minimally-invasive treatment of venous reflux disease, a condition
caused by incompetent vein valves in the leg.
FoxHollow Technologies (NASDAQ: FOXH)
didn’t wait nearly as long as VNUS did to make its initial public
offering, having filed its original S-1 just this August, but FOXH stock
has certainly performed just as well. After being priced at the top of its
range, FOXH has been trading above $20 per share, closing four of its
first 13 days on the market at $25 or more per share.
Based in
Redwood City, California, FoxHollow has no meaningful revenues yet, but it
has a technology that it says could help the 12 million people who are
estimated to have plaque clogging their arteries. The medical device maker
is focused on the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), a result
of the accumulation of plaque in arteries, most commonly occurring in the
pelvis and legs. The accumulation of plaque is known as atherosclerosis, a
condition that reduces the flow of oxygenated blood to tissue and organs,
and over time can increase the risk of heart attack, stroke, amputation or
death. FoxHollow’s device, the SilverHawk Plaque Excision System, allows
surgeons to remove plaque from the arteries in a minimally invasive
fashion. The company reports that it has generated more than $23 million
in revenues (with a net loss of $22 million) by selling more than 12,000
of the devices to more than 500 hospitals in the United States alone, as
of September 30, 2004.
The current
treatments for patients suffering from PAD include non-invasive methods,
such as lifestyle changes and drug therapy, and more invasive methods such
as angioplasty (expanding the artery wall) and stenting (propping open the
artery wall). Traditionally, in many cases where the blocked artery was
below the knee treatment has been delayed until bypass or amputation
surgery became necessary. FoxHollow’s device is expected to be safer and
more efficacious than traditional treatments, and easier to use for
treatments below the knee.
CABG Medical
has filed an amendment to its S-1 statement,
which no longer lists Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated as an
underwriter. Instead, Feltl and Company has now teamed up with
Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. to make the offering, the terms of which
have not changed. CABG is expected to make its debut during the latter
half of November. The company has designed a technology that, if approved,
will provide a Teflon graft product, called the Holly Graft System, to
cardiac surgeons, so that coronary artery bypass surgeries can be done
without harvesting vein grafts from other parts of the body. Approximately
305,000 patients received more than 515,000 bypass procedures in the
United States during 2001, with each surgery estimated by the American
Hospital Association to cost approximately $61,000. It’s hard to say
exactly how much money will be saved by using the Teflon graft, but
presumably by reducing the number of incisions from two (removing a vessel
from the leg or another area of the body, plus attaching it at the new
site) to one, some costs will be cut. The company also expects to find a
growing market for its graft system among the increasing numbers of
elderly and obese, people who may be more likely to suffer cardiovascular
events. |