Let’s take a closer look.
Rising from the ashes of the PPM industry, where it had been known as
MedPartners, Caremark Rx now provides pharmacy benefits management
services and therapeutic pharmaceutical services. Though currently based
in Birmingham, Alabama, CMX is in the process of shifting its headquarters
to Nashville, Tennessee, the de facto corporate capital of the for-profit
health care services industry.
Caremark Rx serves
approximately 20 million members through a network of 55,000 pharmacies,
as well as through its own mail service pharmacies. Its customers
generally include companies, unions, government health plans and, to a
lesser extent, other insurers. In 2002 CMX managed over 91 million
prescriptions from individuals from over 1,200 organizations.
To date, CMX has
concentrated on internal growth. Its only recent acquisition of note was
the April 2002 $48.5 million purchase of Choice Source Therapeutics,
which expanded the company’s specialty distribution business. On a
trailing 12-month basis, CMX generated revenue of $7.9 billion and EBITDA
of $489 million.
Comparison of the top PBMs,
as presented on page 3, reveals that Caremark Rx ranks fourth among the
national providers. Clearly, it would like to capture a larger market
share.
The result of the July 2000 $1
billion merger between Advance Paradigm and Rite Aid
Corporation’s (NYSE: RAD) PCS Health Systems, AdvancePCS
currently provides pharmacy benefits management services to 75 million
plan members. Based in Irving, Texas, ADVP fills over 550 million
prescriptions each year. Its client base includes managed care plans.
A fair portion of ADVP’s growth has
come from acquisition. Besides its $1 billion acquisition of PCS, it paid
$70 million in 1999 for Integrated Pharmaceutical Services, $72.6
million in 2000 for FFI Health and $100 million in 2002 for
Accordant Health.
On a trailing 12-month
basis, ADVP generated revenue of $14.7 billion, EBITDA of $395 million and
net income of $183 million.
Under terms of the current deal, CMX
will pay $5.6 billion in newly-minted shares of its stock and assume $400
million in liabilities. ADVP shareholders are to receive 2.15 shares of
CMX stock for each share of ADVP common they hold. Based on their stock
prices the day before the announcement, that ratio values ADVP stock at
$54.61 per share, a premium of 37%.
Some analysts believe this price is
somewhat rich relative to net earnings. However, other indices, such as
the 0.41x price to revenue ratio, are more in line with historical
transaction multiples for PBMs. The total price also yields a price to
EBITDA multiple of 15.2x, a price per member of $80 and a price per
prescription filled of $10.90.
CMX is to be the surviving
corporation, with its current CEO as CEO of the combined organization. Not
only has CMX management turned the faltering erstwhile PPM into a thriving
company, but it seems better able to squeeze revenue out of its
prescriptions. It seems to generate about $87 for each prescription while
ADVP generates $27.
Upon consummation of the
deal, Caremark would be the largest for-profit health care company
headquartered in Nashville, surpassing hospital giant HCA (NYSE:
HCA) in terms of annual revenue. While it would trail first place Medco
Health Solutions (NYSE: MHS) in terms of annual revenue, it would
surpass it in terms of prescriptions filled annually. This merger would
also open the distance between CMX and third-place ExpressScripts
(NASDAQ: ESRX).
Will this combination run
afoul of antitrust concerns? If market share is measured in terms of
prescriptions filled, probably not. After the deal, it is thought that
Caremark would have a projected 20% of the market, just behind MHS’s 22%
and ahead of Express Scripts 12%. However, strong regulatory scrutiny of
this deal can be expected. If the impact of the merger is evaluated market
by market, regulators may require the divestment of certain operations,
although these would probably be minor in scope.
If this deal goes through,
it may well signal the end of combinations of large PBMs for it is
unlikely the FTC would sanction a merger of ESRX and MHS, reducing the
field of national PBMs to two. Smaller deals will accordingly be the order
of the day. It is estimated that there are now between 30 and 40 local or
regional PBMs, many operating within a single state. These operations will
create the pool of likely PBM acquisition candidates in the near future.
Nor do we expect to see much
concerted M&A activity among PBMs going forward. Growth in the PBM
industry will likely slow down, shadowing in effect the growth trends of
their main suppliers, the big pharma companies. And policy makers will
make some stabs at putting both big pharma and the PBMs under pressure to
contain health care inflation due to prescription drug costs. Neither
situation would appeal to investors.