|

March 2007 issue
SNF Beds Hit Record Price - AL And IL Prices Close To Records Set In 2005
In 2006, the average price paid for skilled nursing beds set a new record,
while assisted and independent living per-unit prices were close to the
records set in 2005.
...
Buying The Sunrise REIT Assets - Ventas and
HCPI Battle It Out For The Prize
After a series of letters and press releases, the battle for the Sunrise
Senior Living REIT assets may all come down to a court decision, or a vote
by shareholders.
...
Other REIT News
Healthcare Realty Trust decides to sell off its senior care assets, but opts
not to go the auction route. Is a sale of the rest of the company possible?
...
Recent Skilled Nursing Deals
In an unusually active month, we have nine separate nursing facility
transactions to report on, with much of the activity in the Midwest.
...
Assisted Living Market
The market is still focused on the large transactions, but a few small ones
managed to get done.
...
Independent Living Market
As the market waits for news of the Holiday Retirement sale, one of the
highest-priced sales ever closes in Arizona.
Sign
up for a trial subscription and get the current issue!
Read more about The
SeniorCare Investor.
Articles Archive
Steve's BLOG on Senior Care
Companies Mentioned in this issue:
March 2007
A
Advocat p15
AEW Senior Housing p11
Alterra p11
B
Beverly Enterprises p14
Brinton Woods Senior Living p9
C
Cambridge Realty Capital p15
Canyon Creek Development p10
CB Richard Ellis p11
E
Elant at Fishkill, Inc. p8
Elant, Inc. p8
F
Fillmore Capital Partners p12
Formation Capital p5
G
GE Healthcare Financial Services p5
Genesis Healthcare p9
Goldman, Sachs p12
H
Healthcare Transactions Group p9
Heavenrich & Company p9
Herbert J. Sims & Co. p8
Holiday Retirement Corporation p6
J
JER Partners p12
K
Kindred Healthcare p9
L
Laurel Health Care p5
Lorien Health Systems p9
Love Funding Corporation p8
M
Madison Dearborn Partners p12
Marcus & Millichap p7
Miller’s Merry Manor p15
N
National Affordable Housing Trust p15
National Church Residences p15
S
Senior Lifestyle Corporation p11
Senior Living Investment Brokerage p7
Senturian Senior Housing Brokerage p10
Sun Healthcare Group p9
T
Tandem Health Care p5
The Ensign Group p9
The Ryerson Company p11
W
Walton Street Capital p11
Wilkinson Corporation p9
|
Buying The Sunrise REIT Assets - Ventas
and HCPI Battle It Out For The Prize
Email Editor
Last month, we reported on the
agreement between Sunrise Real Estate Investment Trust (TSX: SZR.UN)
and Ventas (NYSE: VTR) whereby Ventas would be acquiring the entire
portfolio of Sunrise REIT, which includes 74 assisted living facilities
managed by Sunrise Senior Living (NYSE: SRZ), all of which were
developed by Sunrise the operator. According to the signed acquisition
agreement, Sunrise REIT shareholders will receive the equivalent of
C$15.00 per share, and after adding in the debt Ventas will assume, the
total deal comes in at about $1.8 billion. Because Sunrise owned an
interest in 56 of these 74 facilities that ranged from 15% to 25%, an
approximate grossed-up price comes to around $350,000 per unit, or a 6.2%
cap rate based on 2007 forecasts. This excludes the value of five new
developments and various rights of first refusal and first offer on future
Sunrise developments in Canada and the U.S. Any way you look at it,
however, the price is high but not unusual in this market, and there are a
lot of advantages to Ventas in securing this deal, even though it will be
dilutive in 2007.
We thought the price was so
high, in fact, that we assumed that was how they won the bidding. Ventas
probably assumed so as well. It was, after all, a formal auction process
with the most likely aggressive potential buyers invited into the bidding
process. But a full month after the agreement was signed, Health Care
Property Investors (NYSE: HCP) sent a letter to the Sunrise REIT board
offering C$18.00 per share, or 20% higher than the agreement with Ventas,
but with several conditions and unknowns. Apparently, HCP was in the final
round of bidders and, for reasons unknown, decided not to submit a final
bid.
So what
happened, did HCP figure out how Ventas was going to structure the deal,
including various agreements with Sunrise the operator, and decided it
wanted back in, but at a much higher price? Yes, most people thought the
Ventas price was the top, perhaps even too high, but what we don’t
understand is why HCP didn’t bid in the final round if it was willing, a
month after the fact, to go a full 20% higher than the winning bid? And to
add insult to injury, in his letter to the Sunrise REIT board, the CEO of
HCP stated they had "greater experience in executing large acquisitions
than Ventas," and had a "greater certainty of completion than the proposed
transaction with Ventas." Really? Was the 2005 acquisition, by Ventas, of
Provident Senior Living Trust for $1.2 billion small potatoes, or
the late 2006 acquisition of the Senior Care, Inc. assets for
nearly $650 million mere chump change? In addition, it appeared that
Ventas already had its financing arranged, so why did HCP think there was
less certainty for Ventas to close on the deal? It’s a mystery to us,
other than a bit of hard ball tactics involved, and perhaps a little sour
grapes on the side. Or does HCP management have other ideas? Hmmm.
When the
initial letter was received by the Sunrise REIT board, there were too many
unanswered questions to even respond to HCP’s proposal, including the need
for agreements with Sunrise the manager. A few days later, HCP sent the
board a letter trying to clarify a few issues, and two days after that,
yet another letter for further clarifications. Meanwhile, Ventas stood its
ground, maintaining it had a signed purchase and sale agreement with
Sunrise REIT and was moving forward. Sunrise REIT then went to the Ontario
Superior Court to seek an opinion as to whether HCP was prohibited from
negotiating with Sunrise (the operator) under the terms of Sunrise REIT’s
agreement with Ventas. At about the same time, Ventas filed an application
in the same court demanding that Sunrise REIT comply with its covenants in
the purchase agreement with Ventas and to take all appropriate steps to
enforce Sunrise REIT’s rights under its confidentiality and standstill
agreement with HCP, which, among other things, apparently prohibits HCP
from making any proposal to acquire any or all of the assets of Sunrise
REIT for a period of 18 months, ending May 2008.
Although we
are not trained in legal nuances, especially when it comes to Canadian
securities law, this last point regarding HCP not being able to pursue the
Sunrise REIT assets for 18 months seems to be a major sticking point in
favor of Ventas. Sunrise REIT shareholders will not be happy with it,
especially since the shares have traded up to the C$18.00 offer by HCP.
The court proceedings were supposed to take place on March 1 at 10:00
a.m., but we have no idea how long this legal process will take. The last
news was that HCP contacted Sunrise REIT again stating its desire to have
the same rights as Ventas should Ventas make any modifications to its
original offer.
One
interesting side note to consider is that when HCP entered into a $5.2
billion agreement to purchase CNL Retirement Properties (CNL) in
April 2006 (presumably one of the large transactions it referred to as
having experience with), the agreed upon price was $13.75 per share,
according to the CNL proxy. But two weeks later, "as a result of its due
diligence review," HCP’s financial advisors informed the CNL board that
they intended to reduce the price to $12.25 per share, representing an 11%
drop. The board basically told HCP where to go with that revised offer,
and a day later HCP came back with another offer for $13.50 per share, now
just a 25-cent reduction, which the board decided to accept (probably
because it wasn’t worth 25 cents to go back to the next two top bidders).
The point is that if the Canadian court allows Sunrise REIT to negotiate
with HCP, one of the conditions should be that the price cannot be lowered
below that C$18.00 per share threshold since due diligence is apparently
not a contingency this time.
At this
point, we do not believe that Ventas will up its offer to C$18.00 per
share, nor should they, since it probably would not be accretive at that
level until sometime in late 2008, and also as a matter of principle. We
are sure Ventas will exhaust every legal maneuver available to it, and we
have to wonder how Sunrise the operator would feel about having HCP own
another 74 of its managed facilities on top of the more than 100
facilities managed by Sunrise that are already owned by HCP. That is a
huge concentration with one owner, and no matter how friendly they may be
as a landlord, few operators want to be faced with that prospect.
Publicly, Sunrise the operator has stated that they are fine with either
REIT, but we wonder what is said in private. Regardless of what happens,
this is an expensive transaction, which would be at a sub-6% cap rate if
HCP prevails at C$18.00 per share.
The court is
supposed to make its decision known in the first week of March (after we
go to print). If it allows Sunrise REIT to negotiate with HCP, that 20%
premium will be a nice reward for shareholders. If the court says no,
however, shareholders can vote no on the Ventas deal, which they probably
would do since we have heard there has been heavy turnover in Sunrise REIT
shares since HCP came back into the picture with a higher price, so we
have to assume that many of the new shareholders have a cost basis above
the Ventas offer. Stay tuned.
|
|
FREE TRIAL
TO THE
SENIORCARE
INVESTOR!
If you like this article, there’s lots more
waiting for you in The SeniorCare Investor. It’s the
bible of what's going on in senior care M&A today.
Sign up for two free months right now! There’s no
obligation, no writing “cancel” on a bill. Happy reading!
|
|