|
April 2007 issue
Tomorrow’s Seniors Want Options
- Choice-Driven Senior Living Becomes the New Paradigm
The choice-driven market is upon us and represents an opportunity for senior
care providers.
...
College Amenities Attract Seniors -
Campus Continuum Tweaks Retirement Community Model
Campus Continuum helps colleges and universities set up communities for
healthy, active, “younger” retirees.
...
Q&A With Robert Jenkens
What’s the Green House® Program all about, and is the model catching on?
...
Pittsburgh Retirement Community on
the Block
B’nai B’rith plans to sell its Covenant at South Hills retirement community
at auction on April 26.
...
Juniata College Embarks on Campus
Continuum Project
Ready to roll out an affiliated retirement community, Juniata looks forward
to new friends, fees, and fundraising opportunities for the school.
Sign
up for a trial subscription and get the current issue!
Read more about
Senior Living
Business.
Articles Archive
Steve's BLOG on Senior Care
Companies Mentioned in this issue:
April 2007
B’nai B’rith International p3
Campus Continuum p1
Gerontological Services, Inc. p1
Juniata College p7
Life Care Services, LLC. p3
The Covenant of South Hills p3
Trinity Continuing Care Services p4
Ungaretti & Harris Healthcare Practices Group p4
|
Q&A With Robert Jenkens
Email Editor
Robert Jenkens is Director of the
Green House ®
Replication Initiative and Vice President of NCB Capital Impact (formerly
NCB Development Corporation). Through a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation, NCB Capital Impact, a not-for-profit organization based in
Washington, provides policy and development consulting to states,
communities, and organizations that are interested in developing a Green
House Program. This innovative senior-care model deinstitutionalizes
long-term care by eliminating large nursing facilities and, instead,
creating habilitative, social settings. Jenkens, who is also a founding
board member of the Center for Excellence in Assisted Living, studied
architecture (with an emphasis on residential care for older persons) at
Cornell, real estate development at MIT, and public policy at Harvard’s
JFK School of Government.
What is the
Green House philosophy? A greenhouse is an
environment that enhances life and growth. Being old and needing nursing
home care doesn’t mean that your life is over. Our Green Houses are places
where elders can continue to thrive and grow. The mission of the Green
House Program, then, is to shift the way we provide long-term care in this
country from the current large, institutional model to a small home
environment. People still receive very high levels of care in a Green
House environment, but the primary focus is on providing a comfortable
home and a meaningful life for the residents.
How is the Green
House model unique? Each Green House has
six to 10 private bedrooms and bathrooms, with a kitchen, living room, and
dining room in one big area called "The Hearth." All food is prepared from
scratch in the house by the self-managed work team, because that
encourages socialization, creativity, and a sense of family. Workers
engage the residents in activities — including helping with meals and
offering advice — which leverages the staff in ways that have been pretty
much shut down in traditional nursing homes. It may be easy to build a
10-bedroom house; but it’s difficult to operate a successful Green House
without fully understanding the philosophical and organizational shift.
The physical environment — the architecture, aesthetics, and scale of the
home — reflects only about one-third of the model. The balance is in the
reorganization of the way care and services are delivered.
How
are care and services delivered? The
direct-care workers in each house are called Shahbazim, a title derived
from the Persian word for royal falcon and from a tale about how a falcon
protected, sustained, and nurtured a dying elder in the desert. After
receiving special training, Shahbazim are organized into self-managed work
teams that run each house. The ratio is two Shahbazim to 10 elders in
shifts covering 24 hours a day. They cook, clean, provide personal care,
and do some therapy work. As a result, they know the residents as family.
If any aspect of a resident changes, a Shahbaz will notice right away. The
Shahbazim have power and authority over the management of the house and
become part of the overall Green House system in a very meaningful way.
How
is NCB Capital Impact using its grant monies?
In
November 2005, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provided a $10 million
grant to help spread Green Houses to 50 campuses over five years and to
create an ongoing, self-sustaining, replication center. At the end of five
years, and without additional funding, we will be able to continue to help
people create and implement Green Houses. The grant allows us to provide
technical assistance — financial viability, fundraising, financing,
development, pre-opening planning, training, and post-opening operational
assistance — to anyone wanting to create a Green House. It also directs us
to create a tool kit (design guidelines, policies and procedures, and
Web-based training manuals) to help people create Green Houses. And we
will create an ongoing quality assurance and research element to ensure
that Green Houses don’t just look good — they really are good.
Is
the model for both for-profits and not-for-profits?
The
Green House model is designed for nursing homes that have to rebuild or
for organizations that are building new long-term care facilities,
typically skilled nursing homes. It is suitable for any nursing home in
the country — whether for-profit or not-for-profit. Most current adopters
are not-for-profits. The typical pattern when an innovative idea spreads
into the culture is that mission-driven people don’t need a lot of
evidence and will adopt it first. They see something, think it’s better,
and figure out a way to make it happen. The for-profits typically need
evidence that something works before jumping in. They’re concerned about
the financial and regulatory implications. Our first Green House was built
in Tupelo, Mississippi, in 2003. We have eight campuses open today,
another 25 projects in development, and are just now beginning to get
calls from for-profit operators.
How do costs
compare? The physical structure should
cost no more than rebuilding in a traditional fashion, but Green Houses
require private bedrooms and baths. So developers must compare apples to
apples when comparing costs. On the operations side, cutting down on the
departmental structure can offset the added cost of self-managed work
teams. We have a very sophisticated financial model. In fact, the first
piece of our technical assistance is to work on the financial pro forma.
Do you expect the
Green House model to catch on?
While we don’t expect
every nursing home to convert to a Green House model, we do hope that in
10 years we will have made substantial headway in eliminating the old
institutional models. We hope Green Houses will be one of the options
available to people in their communities. |
|