|
September 2007 issue
Intricacies of Affordable Senior Housing--
A Discussion About HUD’s 202 Program and How It Works
The demand for affordable senior
housing projects far exceeds the supply of available capital. While the HUD
202 program has changed in recent years, it still allows the construction of
affordable housing. Our experts discuss the program and how it works.
...
Flexible Financing—Updated Mission-
Lutheran Social Services of Michigan Expands, Renovates
When Lutheran Social Services of Michigan wanted to upgrade its MapleCreek
community, it first had to meet the banker’s metrics for future funding.
Then it could refinance its existing debt and secure funds for the new
project — a $50 million package.
...
Q&A With Larry Minnix
William L. (Larry) Minnix,
president and CEO of AAHSA, talks about his views regarding the future of
not-for-profit senior care facilities and where he believes the industry is
headed over the next decade or so.
...
Recent Refinancings
Recent Sale
We detail a few refinancing deals
and a sale that closed in recent weeks.
Sign
up for a trial subscription and get the current issue!
Read more about
Senior Living
Business.
Articles Archive
Steve's BLOG on Senior Care
Companies Mentioned in this issue:
September 2007
A
American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging p2, p4
American Baptist Homes of the West p2
E
Erickson Retirement Communities p2
F
Franklin United Methodist Community p3
H
Herbert J. Sims p3
K
Kendal p2
L
Lancaster Pollard p3, p6
Lancaster Pollard Mortgage Company p4
Lutheran Social Services of Michigan (LSSM) p1
M
Madrid Home for the Aging p3
MapleCreek p1
Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services p3
N
National Church Residences (NCR) p4
National Equity Fund ((NEF) p5
North Florida Retirement Village, Inc. p3
P
Presbyterian Homes of Michigan p2
S
Summerfield Plaza Apartments p3
T
The Inn at Cedars p3
V
Village on the Isle p3
W
Wesley Woods Center of Emory University p2
Westchester Villages p3
WindsorMeade of Williamsburg p3
Z
Ziegler p3 |
Flexible Financing—Updated Mission--
Lutheran Social Services of Michigan
Expands, Renovates
Email Editor
At a ground-breaking ceremony in June, the planting of a maple tree
symbolically marked the beginning of the expansion and renovation of
MapleCreek, a senior living community in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and
officially launched the largest project in the 73-year history of its
sponsor, Lutheran Social Services of Michigan (LSSM).
The $30.5 million MapleCreek project involves the expansion and remodeling
of existing campus buildings, along with additional memory care
facilities, a new rehabilitation center for residents (inpatient and
outpatient), new one- and two-bedroom independent living apartments with
kitchenettes, and 33 new two-, three- and four-unit condominium-style
cottages on the MapleCreek property. The entire project, which will be
tackled in three phases, is expected to take two years to complete.
The June event also marked the embarkation of a new financing structure
for LSSM, one that provides more financial flexibility for the
organization and that will allow it to continue to reinvest and develop as
senior living needs arise. Lancaster Pollard has been working with
LSSM for the last several years to modify its existing capital structure,
refinance its debt, lower its borrowing costs, consider various
development opportunities, and position the organization so it can modify
the senior living services it offers in Grand Rapids, Michigan, according
to Gerald M. Swiacki, senior vice president at Lancaster Pollard.
“Embracing concepts about optimal capital structure or accessing the
capital markets to meet strategic capital needs is not always an easy
thing for a not-for-profit organization to do,” he says. “Traditionally,
not-for-profits figure they’re meeting their fiduciary responsibility by
firmly establishing their debt service and, therefore, issue fixed-rate
debt. In addition, they generally try to minimize the amount of debt that
they put into a project by investing as much equity (cash) as they can in
the transaction.”
Also, not-for-profits, as a rule, have comparatively limited access to
capital, which generally comes from sources such as operations, the
disposition of assets, the generosity of benefactors, or, ultimately, the
debt markets — and which, from a banking perspective, results in an
underleveraged product.
“We’ve tried to get our clients to recognize that when they need cash or
capital to fund projects, accessing the capital markets – whether that
involves a regular commercial loan or a bond financing — usually results
in the shortest time frame,” Swiacki adds. “If these organizations can
manage their credit profile to allow access to the capital markets, that
provides flexibility when they’re ready to pull the trigger on a project.”
Refinancing to gain liquidity
Specifically, Swiacki and his team try to get their not-for-profit clients
to recognize the opportunity in variable rates for tax-exempt bonds, which
have historically averaged 3.2 percent.
“If we can manage the ups and downs of the curve, we believe variable-rate
bonds put the organization in a better financial position,” he says.
“Negotiating a fixed rate of, say, 6.5 percent for long-term tax-exempt
bonds and also paying for credit enhancement— either in the form of bond
insurance or a letter of credit — means the organization would be looking
at an all-in cost of capital approaching 7.0 percent or more. For LSSM,
that would mean giving up, every year, three points on its $30.5 million
in new debt.”
Once that was explained, LSSM embraced the concept and began positioning
itself to accomplish its financial objectives. LSSM had to restructure
$17.8 million in existing debt to improve its credit standing; then, it
had to arrange the additional $30.5 million of debt for the MapleCreek
project.
LSSM had a number of outstanding bond issues dating back to the 1990s. In
2003, LSSM refinanced all its outstanding indebtedness — the $17.8 million
— through Lancaster Pollard, which also fashioned a plan to enhance LSSM’s
operations. The plan focused on mission, on retaining liquidity, and on
reducing the overall cost of borrowing. “After completely refinancing
LSSM’s existing debt,” says Swiacki, “we worked for nearly four years on
planning the redevelopment of the MapleCreek project.”
The 2007 bonds for MapleCreek amounted to $30.5 million of new money. But
because a new bank relationship – a new letter of credit provider – was
involved, it meant substituting the letter of credit on the old 2003 bond
issue. Therefore, in aggregate, it amounted to a nearly $50 million
relationship that Lancaster Pollard was competitively shopping to local
banks for the lowest cost of capital and best terms.
Meeting the metrics
Banks, of course, measure certain metrics — creditworthiness, cash flow,
and liquidity — when considering whether to issue a letter of credit. In
2003, LSSM had fantastic credit characteristics, in that it had a
tremendous amount of assets to leverage a loan and offer as collateral,
but the organization also needed to show healthy cash-flow and liquidity
characteristics. Its cash-flow coverage was only reasonable, and liquidity
was unenviable. So while LSSM had good borrowing capacity in one metric,
it did not have it in two others.
“By refinancing our existing debt in 2003, we were able to build up our
cash and our liquidity to give us a better opportunity for future
financing,” says Lou Ellen McGrath, CFO of LSSM. “Originally, we were
planning on selling some existing assets and using the money from that
sale to build the new cottages at MapleCreek. We didn’t want to borrow any
new money. Lancaster Pollard convinced us that we should keep the cash on
our balance sheet and finance the new building project.”
Reducing its cost of capital in the 2003 refinancing began to have an
effect on LSSM’s bottom line. Investing its own cash and borrowing to meet
capital needs did a really good job of increasing liquidity and
flexibility. “LSSM’s new financing structure is particularly noteworthy,”
says Swiacki, “because the organization would never have been able to
borrow that much money [$50 million] when we did the 2003 refinancing.”
The new project
LSSM is the largest faith-based, not-for-profit, human service
organization in the state of Michigan, but only about half of its revenue
comes from senior living services. The rest comes from other social
services such as foster care, adoption services, child care, subsidized
housing, homeless assistance, and refugee services.
Besides MapleCreek, which is a continuing care facility, LSSM sponsors a
dozen subsidized senior housing apartment complexes, four nursing homes,
three assisted living facilities, two independent living senior housing
facilities, and MapleCreek At Home, a home-care service that is associated
with MapleCreek and covers five neighboring counties.
MapleCreek currently offers traditional independent living, assisted
living, and skilled nursing services. The independent living offering is
in efficiency apartments with support, which are less marketable than a
modern, full-continuum senior living community.
“LSSM wanted to enhance the amenities at MapleCreek to make it a more
attractive campus,” says Swiacki. “We went through a number of iterations
on the size and scope of the project, as well as the type and number of
units to offer.”
The team worked concurrently on the financial and operational sides of the
entire organization to help LSSM manage its bottom line and improve its
credit characteristics in order to be able to access the capital market.
“We also made sure that the market being targeted in the repositioning of
the campus really existed,” he adds.
The new project involves a complete renovation and repositioning of the
campus — a culture change. Essentially, LSSM is redeveloping the entire
independent living area with brand-new condominiums and cluster homes. It
is also instituting entrance fees, which the previous facility did not
require. Residents will have access to certain amenities on the campus and
pay a la carte fees for certain other amenities.
In addition, the assisted living area is being expanded by 50 percent,
from 40 units to 60 units, over a two-year period so as not to displace
anyone nor disrupt operations during construction. The memory care section
will be expanded, and the nursing home will be upgraded. Part of the
nursing home will have a new rehabilitation wing to accommodate both
residents and nonresidents needing physical and rehabilitative therapy. In
the end, MapleCreek will be a full-continuum senior care facility.
“I believe that the new culture change and the new financing structure go
hand in hand,” says Swiacki.
“When an organization modifies its approach in a market, it may be
suffering from vacancy issues or the amenities aren’t attractive enough to
entice people to move to the campus. A market study uncovers changes,
expansions, and modifications that the market
demands in the facility’s offerings.”
Once the project was defined, Lancaster Pollard opened up a competitive
bidding process, and the bids came in very aggressively from every bank
that received packages. “We actually went back to the bank that had the
original relationship and said: ‘We need your credit enhancement to sell
the bonds. We’ve structured the financing this way. And we’re giving you
an opportunity to make a pre-emptive bid to keep the relationship.’ If
that bank had come back with a fair price, we would have suggested LSSM
continue what had been a long-term relationship. Instead, the quote was an
increase over the existing pricing.”
In the end, LSSM’s credit enhancement cost decreased by more than 50
percent due to the competitive bid process, and much more flexible
financial covenants and terms were negotiated. “We’re getting a better
rate on the $17.8 million,” says McGrath. “The loans are for 27 years at
5.0 percent, so the refinancing is probably saving us 1.5 percent compared
to the terms of the original loan.”
LSSM is also saving money on the reduced enhancement costs on the
outstanding $17.8 million and in the cost of debt service in the
neighborhood of $170,000 a year — also attributable to the initial $17.8
million. In the aggregate, of course, debt service is higher, because the
$30.5 million is all new debt.
“The great thing about this project is that it’s designed to attract and
meet the needs of the great middle market,” says Swiacki. “There’s just so
much available to the high-end market, but the middle market isn’t well
served with affordable senior housing. So that’s the mission of LSSM –
meeting the needs of the middle market.”
|
|